Some law deans were surprised to learn that a federal bankruptcy judge had decided to give their schools $4 million each in punitive damages awarded in a California coupleâ€™s wrongful foreclosure case against Bank of America.
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Christopher Klein of Sacramento awarded $1 million in actual damages and $45 million in punitive damages in the suit by Erik and Renee Sundquist, who endured a â€œmortgage modification charadeâ€� and â€œa Kafkaesque nightmareâ€� that included a stay-violating foreclosure. Law.com covered the decision (PDF).
Klein directed that the Sundquists are to keep $5 million of the punitive award and deliver $10 million to the National Consumer Law Center, $10 million to the National Consumer Bankruptcy Rights Center, and $4 million each to the five public law schools in the University of California system (Berkeley, Davis, Hastings, Los Angeles and Irvine).
The contributions are to be used for education in consumer law and consumer legal services.
Some law deans who spoke with Law.com said they were unaware of the case until they were alerted to the ruling by University of California at Irvine law dean Erwin Chemerinsky. â€œIt caught me out of the blue,â€� said UC Davis law dean Kevin Johnson.
Klein said Bank of America could have a remittitur of the $40 million in punitive damages awarded to the schools and consumer organizations if it agrees to give them 75 percent of the pretax designated amounts.
The bankâ€™s â€œhigh degree of reprehensibilityâ€� in the case and its â€œcynical disregard for the lawâ€� merited the punitive award, Klein said.
Bank of America had â€œwillfully violatedâ€� a bankruptcy court stay by foreclosing on the Sundquistsâ€™ residence, Klein said. The Sundquists had defaulted on their loan after Bank of America advised them that they had to do so to obtain a mortgage modification.
According to Klein, the bank had conducted harassing inspections of the coupleâ€™s residence, forced them to move, secretly rescinded the foreclosure, and failed to protect the property from looting. The bankâ€™s actions caused emotional distress, lost income, an apparent heart attack, a suicide attempt and post-traumatic stress, the judge said.
â€œFranz Kafka lives,â€� Klein wrote. â€œThis automatic stay violation case reveals that he works at Bank of America.â€�
Klein said it would be wrong to use â€œsimplistic multiplesâ€� to limit punitive damages to up to six times compensatory damages because the amount would be â€œlaughed off in Bank of Americaâ€™s boardroomâ€� as the cost of doing business. Yet awarding the full $45 million to the Sundquists would be greater than justified by principles of fairness, he said. He noted a Supreme Court of Ohio decision treating society as a de facto party in some punitive damage cases and said the principle could be applied to the Sundquistsâ€™ case.
UC Hastings law dean David Faigman commented on the case in his interview with Law.com. â€œIn a sense, what the court is saying is when a defendant has behaved badly, the costs associated with that is providing resources to support legal education to create protectors so that other, future defendants donâ€™t behave badly,â€� he said.
Law.com noted that it is not unheard of for judges to award cy pres awards to law schools, but those cases are typically class action lawsuits. â€œWeâ€™re not counting the money just yet,â€� Faigman said.
Bank of America said in a statement that it regrets that the Sundquists had â€œa challenging experience.â€�
â€œWe believe some of the courtâ€™s rulings are unprecedented and unsupported, and we plan to appeal,â€� the statement said.